Great expectations dating service out business


15-Dec-2020 04:54

"We haven't had complaints like that in our office," Christine said.

In Minnesota, at least 10 customers have sued Great Expectations in small claims court, but court records do not show the outcome of those cases.

Plaintiffs Roe and Doe are two Great Expectations clients who entered into contracts with GE Management.

Printed on GE Management forms, these contracts expressly provided that defendant “will provide zero number of social referrals” and “is not promising to furnish the member with any social referrals and the member does not desire or expect the Company to furnish social referrals.” Plaintiff Doe paid 00 pursuant to her contract, which had a six month term, and met no one through the service.

Accordingly, was the maximum lawful charge for each contract.

In addition, the Court found that the form contract provided by defendant violated numerous provisions of the Dating Services Law concerning terms that must be contained in such contracts, including provisions providing for the return of personal information after the conclusion of the contract.

great expectations dating service out business-81

dating ideas dayton oh

Seven customers remained unsatisfied despite the company's attempts to resolve their complaints, according to the BBB.

Online Dating Service Subject To New York Dating Services Law Court finds that the defendant Internet dating service Great Expectations, also known as GE Management Group of N.

Unauthorized internet reseller of plaintiff’s products is not guilty of trademark infringement, and does not cause actionable initial interest confusion, by using plaintiff’s trademarks in meta tags of website at which plaintiff’s and its competitors’ products are sold, and in...

Y., Inc., violated New York’s Dating Services Law, General Business Law Section 394(c), by charging two clients 00 and 90, respectively, pursuant to contracts which failed to promise to provide either client with a specified number of social referrals per month.

In such situations, held the Court, New York’s Dating Services Law only permits the clients to be charged for ‘social referral services’.Officials with the company's corporate office in Austin, Texas, referred calls to the Minnesota franchise.